<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Barack Obama a Pragmatist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/2009/03/03/is-barak-obama-a-pragmatist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/2009/03/03/is-barak-obama-a-pragmatist/</link>
	<description>Because Philosophy is not a Luxury</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 22:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanna</title>
		<link>http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/2009/03/03/is-barak-obama-a-pragmatist/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/?p=165#comment-50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jeff, this is an interesting question you posed and a mind stretcher I have to say,  - is Barack Obama a Pragmatist? I had to search out the meaning and understand what you presented as Pragmatism.   I do really like this philosophical view very much, it appeals enormously because it is intelligent and rational and grounded in practicality.  At the end of the day seems to make absolute sense, because it is based on the idea that an idea has to be workable, and if not, then discard it and move on to something else,  replace it with  something more valid and practical.  If it does not work or is not useful in solving problems and informing, why use it basically, that&#039;s  my black and white response.  From my observations of Barack Obama and from the autobiography &#039;Dreams of my Father&#039; I&#039;ve been reading, so far I would have to say that he appears to have very strong  Pragmatist leanings.  He definitely seemed to be searching out what was really true as a young man finding his place in the world and then later as a community organizer working to improve social issues.   If something did not work he strove really hard to improve things or change them until they did.  Above you have defined Pragmatists as &#039;believing so much in their ideas that they are willing to risk acting on them, but they are not fixed in their beliefs.  They are fluid, adaptible and introspective&#039;.   Barack Obama believed in his ideals to lead America as president and to change things for the better, by putting himself on the line, he took that great risk and acting on these ideals by running for president.  From my observations of Barack Obama from afar, he does appear to have a fluid, easy going and adaptible character, and he does seem to be a deep thinker, to be a contemplative and introspective person.  If this is the case, then I think we are in the best hands possible because he has a big and challenging job ahead, one which affects the whole world.  I think our future actually depends on if  he does  have the qualities of the Pragmatist with a capital &#039;P&#039;.  I&#039;m sure Barack Obama will be tested, and then the proof will be in the pudding, as to wether his responses  meet the criteria of qualifying to be awarded the title of Pragmatist.   Like you, I certainly hope so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff, this is an interesting question you posed and a mind stretcher I have to say,  &#8211; is Barack Obama a Pragmatist? I had to search out the meaning and understand what you presented as Pragmatism.   I do really like this philosophical view very much, it appeals enormously because it is intelligent and rational and grounded in practicality.  At the end of the day seems to make absolute sense, because it is based on the idea that an idea has to be workable, and if not, then discard it and move on to something else,  replace it with  something more valid and practical.  If it does not work or is not useful in solving problems and informing, why use it basically, that&#8217;s  my black and white response.  From my observations of Barack Obama and from the autobiography &#8216;Dreams of my Father&#8217; I&#8217;ve been reading, so far I would have to say that he appears to have very strong  Pragmatist leanings.  He definitely seemed to be searching out what was really true as a young man finding his place in the world and then later as a community organizer working to improve social issues.   If something did not work he strove really hard to improve things or change them until they did.  Above you have defined Pragmatists as &#8216;believing so much in their ideas that they are willing to risk acting on them, but they are not fixed in their beliefs.  They are fluid, adaptible and introspective&#8217;.   Barack Obama believed in his ideals to lead America as president and to change things for the better, by putting himself on the line, he took that great risk and acting on these ideals by running for president.  From my observations of Barack Obama from afar, he does appear to have a fluid, easy going and adaptible character, and he does seem to be a deep thinker, to be a contemplative and introspective person.  If this is the case, then I think we are in the best hands possible because he has a big and challenging job ahead, one which affects the whole world.  I think our future actually depends on if  he does  have the qualities of the Pragmatist with a capital &#8216;P&#8217;.  I&#8217;m sure Barack Obama will be tested, and then the proof will be in the pudding, as to wether his responses  meet the criteria of qualifying to be awarded the title of Pragmatist.   Like you, I certainly hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Carreira</title>
		<link>http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/2009/03/03/is-barak-obama-a-pragmatist/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Carreira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/?p=165#comment-48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if philosophical views can kick butt, but if they can, Pragmatism does in my book. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if philosophical views can kick butt, but if they can, Pragmatism does in my book. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esther Kassovicz</title>
		<link>http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/2009/03/03/is-barak-obama-a-pragmatist/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Esther Kassovicz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/?p=165#comment-47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your interesting post Jeff. I never thought of Pragmatism this way, but really appreciate having such a simple name for this important concept. Would you say that Pragmatism beats the crap out of postmodern relativism or fundamentalist determinism that both place no demands on us to move off our buts to DO something about what we say we believe in?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your interesting post Jeff. I never thought of Pragmatism this way, but really appreciate having such a simple name for this important concept. Would you say that Pragmatism beats the crap out of postmodern relativism or fundamentalist determinism that both place no demands on us to move off our buts to DO something about what we say we believe in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Binder</title>
		<link>http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/2009/03/03/is-barak-obama-a-pragmatist/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Binder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/?p=165#comment-42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff,

This is great investigation!  As a former doctoral student in Philosophy, I ultimately gave up on &quot;traditional&quot; philosophy in favor of the work of B.F. Skinner, who in my view was the ultimate Pragmatist in the way you describe it with a big &quot;P.&quot;  Although he was often misunderstood by those who read his work superficially, or apparently did not read it with comprehension (e.g., Noam Chomsky), his more philosophical writing was, for example, non-dual (although he did not describe it as such) and very much in alignment with those who understand &quot;meaning&quot; to be based on use and empirical demonstration.  His research was an open-ended investigation of what factors in the environment could be discovered to influence human behavior, both &quot;inner&quot; behavior and &quot;outer&quot; behavior.  The science and technologies that came out of his &quot;Radical Behaviorism&quot; continue to influence just about every aspect of management, education, therapy, psychology, and so many other areas of human activity -- despite protests by those who view it as &quot;mechanistic.&quot;  It is no more mechanistic than our understanding of karma or interdependent origination. And it is certainly consistent with the &quot;systems thinking&quot; that I believe is at the root of Obama&#039;s second-tier approach to governance.

Thank you very much for this blog.  I hope you will investigate some of Skinner&#039;s work as part of your research, including perhaps some of his collections of essays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>This is great investigation!  As a former doctoral student in Philosophy, I ultimately gave up on &#8220;traditional&#8221; philosophy in favor of the work of B.F. Skinner, who in my view was the ultimate Pragmatist in the way you describe it with a big &#8220;P.&#8221;  Although he was often misunderstood by those who read his work superficially, or apparently did not read it with comprehension (e.g., Noam Chomsky), his more philosophical writing was, for example, non-dual (although he did not describe it as such) and very much in alignment with those who understand &#8220;meaning&#8221; to be based on use and empirical demonstration.  His research was an open-ended investigation of what factors in the environment could be discovered to influence human behavior, both &#8220;inner&#8221; behavior and &#8220;outer&#8221; behavior.  The science and technologies that came out of his &#8220;Radical Behaviorism&#8221; continue to influence just about every aspect of management, education, therapy, psychology, and so many other areas of human activity &#8212; despite protests by those who view it as &#8220;mechanistic.&#8221;  It is no more mechanistic than our understanding of karma or interdependent origination. And it is certainly consistent with the &#8220;systems thinking&#8221; that I believe is at the root of Obama&#8217;s second-tier approach to governance.</p>
<p>Thank you very much for this blog.  I hope you will investigate some of Skinner&#8217;s work as part of your research, including perhaps some of his collections of essays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eb</title>
		<link>http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/2009/03/03/is-barak-obama-a-pragmatist/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolutionaryphilosophy.com/?p=165#comment-41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jeff,
Great article!
I have never looked at a pragmatist as someone who stakes themselves on their beliefs in actions; this is quite a leap from my small &quot;p&quot; perception of pragmatism so far. But with this educating article of yours I am convinced that Obama is a PRAGMATIST. At the same time I am also aware that he needs other Pragmatists (like me and you and as many as possible) to be victorious!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,<br />
Great article!<br />
I have never looked at a pragmatist as someone who stakes themselves on their beliefs in actions; this is quite a leap from my small &#8220;p&#8221; perception of pragmatism so far. But with this educating article of yours I am convinced that Obama is a PRAGMATIST. At the same time I am also aware that he needs other Pragmatists (like me and you and as many as possible) to be victorious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

